Adapt conclusion

manuscrit/99_conclusion/main.tex

@@ -73,10 +73,12 @@ the advantage of being automatic; our frontend model significantly improves a
 backend model's accuracy and our dependencies model significantly improves
 \uica{}'s results, while being consistent with a dynamic dependencies analysis.
 
-Evaluating the three models combined as a complete analyzer would have been
-most meaningful. However, as we argue in the pre-conclusive chapter
-\nameref{chap:wrapping_up}, this is sadly not pragmatic, as tools do not easily
-combine without a large amount f engineering.
+Finally, in the pre-conclusive chapter \nameref{chap:wrapping_up}, we loosely
+combine our three pieces of code analyzer model into a very simple full model,
+returning the maximal prediction from the three major bottleneck analyzers.
+While this simplistic model would certainly benefit from a more integrated
+approach, our results already significantly surpass \llvmmca{}, one of the very
+few state-of-the-art tools on ARM processors.
 
 \bigskip{}