From 421eeaf4fdb8bf0af7feca108b9e4fc7c820c70d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Th=C3=A9ophile=20Bastian?= Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 13:18:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Adapt conclusion --- manuscrit/99_conclusion/main.tex | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/manuscrit/99_conclusion/main.tex b/manuscrit/99_conclusion/main.tex index 519645d..9a527f8 100644 --- a/manuscrit/99_conclusion/main.tex +++ b/manuscrit/99_conclusion/main.tex @@ -73,10 +73,12 @@ the advantage of being automatic; our frontend model significantly improves a backend model's accuracy and our dependencies model significantly improves \uica{}'s results, while being consistent with a dynamic dependencies analysis. -Evaluating the three models combined as a complete analyzer would have been -most meaningful. However, as we argue in the pre-conclusive chapter -\nameref{chap:wrapping_up}, this is sadly not pragmatic, as tools do not easily -combine without a large amount f engineering. +Finally, in the pre-conclusive chapter \nameref{chap:wrapping_up}, we loosely +combine our three pieces of code analyzer model into a very simple full model, +returning the maximal prediction from the three major bottleneck analyzers. +While this simplistic model would certainly benefit from a more integrated +approach, our results already significantly surpass \llvmmca{}, one of the very +few state-of-the-art tools on ARM processors. \bigskip{}