Automating manual frontend: discussion on loss of precision vs. automating
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d0af4198e
commit
03f7eceb57
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -550,3 +550,12 @@ between processors' frontends. A comparative study of their respective
|
|||
importance to accurately model frontends, and ways to circumvent their impact
|
||||
on the measure of $\cycF{\kerK}$ to count \uops{} per instruction would also be
|
||||
needed.
|
||||
|
||||
Such fully-automated methods would probably be unable to account for
|
||||
``unusual'' frontend bottlenecks ---~at least not at the level of detail that
|
||||
\eg{} \uica{} authors gather for Intel frontends~\cite{uica}. This level of
|
||||
detail, however, is possible exactly because the authors' restricted their
|
||||
scope to microarchitectures that share a lot of similarity, coming from the
|
||||
same manufacturer. Assessing extent of the loss of precision of an
|
||||
automatically-generated model, and its gain of precision \wrt{} a model without
|
||||
frontend, remains to be done.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue