Th2.3: prove error case of transitivity
This commit is contained in:
parent
55eef82c54
commit
c49f9d3f6e
1 changed files with 14 additions and 8 deletions
18
wp.v
18
wp.v
|
@ -222,6 +222,12 @@ Proof.
|
|||
- simpl. unfold assertImplLogical in impl. apply (impl m). apply conseq.
|
||||
Qed.
|
||||
|
||||
Lemma interp_of_error (s: Instr):
|
||||
interp s (MemError) = MemError.
|
||||
Proof.
|
||||
unfold MemError. destruct s; cbv; trivial.
|
||||
Qed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Theorem hoare_provability_implies_consequence :
|
||||
forall (pre: Assert), forall (s: Instr), forall (post: Assert),
|
||||
|
@ -229,18 +235,18 @@ Theorem hoare_provability_implies_consequence :
|
|||
-> ( |= [| pre |] s [| post |] ) % assert.
|
||||
Proof.
|
||||
intros pre instr post. intros deduction.
|
||||
induction deduction; intros mem preInMem; simpl.
|
||||
induction deduction; intros mem preInMem.
|
||||
- exact preInMem.
|
||||
- trivial.
|
||||
- simpl; trivial.
|
||||
- exact preInMem.
|
||||
- apply (weaken_in_conseq post' post (interp s (MemElem mem)) H0).
|
||||
apply IHdeduction. apply H. exact preInMem.
|
||||
- destruct (interp s1 (MemElem mem)) eqn:mRel.
|
||||
admit.
|
||||
apply (IHdeduction2 m). unfold hoare_consequence in IHdeduction1.
|
||||
- simpl; destruct (interp s1 (MemElem mem)) eqn:mRel.
|
||||
* fold MemError. rewrite (interp_of_error s2); simpl; trivial.
|
||||
* apply (IHdeduction2 m). unfold hoare_consequence in IHdeduction1.
|
||||
specialize IHdeduction1 with mem as IH1_mem.
|
||||
rewrite mRel in IH1_mem. apply IH1_mem. assumption.
|
||||
- destruct (expr mem =? 0)%Z eqn:branchEqn.
|
||||
- simpl; destruct (expr mem =? 0)%Z eqn:branchEqn.
|
||||
* apply (IHdeduction2 mem). unfold assertOfExpr.
|
||||
unfold assertAnd. split.
|
||||
+ assumption.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue