diff --git a/manuscrit/60_staticdeps/50_eval.tex b/manuscrit/60_staticdeps/50_eval.tex
index 0dbb5b5..1b0337a 100644
--- a/manuscrit/60_staticdeps/50_eval.tex
+++ b/manuscrit/60_staticdeps/50_eval.tex
@@ -239,20 +239,6 @@ finer (conservative) filtering of which \uops{} must be considered dependent
 ---~\eg{} a memory dependency can only come from a memory-related \uop{}~---
 may enhance the accuracy of our integration.
 
-\medskip{}
-
-We then evaluate our gains by running \cesasme{}'s harness as we did in
-\autoref{chap:CesASMe}, running both \uica{} and \uicadeps{}, on two datasets:
-first, the full set of 3\,500 binaries from the previous chapter; then, the
-set of binaries pruned to exclude benchmarks heavily relying on memory-carried
-dependencies introduced in \autoref{ssec:memlatbound}. If \staticdeps{} is
-beneficial to \uica{}, we expect \uicadeps{} to yield significantly better
-results than \uica{} alone on the first dataset. On the second dataset,
-however, \staticdeps{} should provide no significant contribution, as the
-dataset was pruned to not exhibit significant memory-carried latency-boundness.
-We present these results in \autoref{table:staticdeps_uica_cesasme}, as well as
-the corresponding box-plots in \autoref{fig:staticdeps_uica_cesasme_boxplot}.
-
 \begin{table}
     \centering
     \footnotesize
@@ -281,6 +267,20 @@ memory-carried dependencies rows}\label{fig:staticdeps_uica_cesasme_boxplot}
 
 \medskip{}
 
+We then evaluate our gains by running \cesasme{}'s harness as we did in
+\autoref{chap:CesASMe}, running both \uica{} and \uicadeps{}, on two datasets:
+first, the full set of 3\,500 binaries from the previous chapter; then, the
+set of binaries pruned to exclude benchmarks heavily relying on memory-carried
+dependencies introduced in \autoref{ssec:memlatbound}. If \staticdeps{} is
+beneficial to \uica{}, we expect \uicadeps{} to yield significantly better
+results than \uica{} alone on the first dataset. On the second dataset,
+however, \staticdeps{} should provide no significant contribution, as the
+dataset was pruned to not exhibit significant memory-carried latency-boundness.
+We present these results in \autoref{table:staticdeps_uica_cesasme}, as well as
+the corresponding box-plots in \autoref{fig:staticdeps_uica_cesasme_boxplot}.
+
+\medskip{}
+
 The full dataset \uicadeps{} row is extremely close, on every metric, to the
 pruned, \uica{}-only row. On this basis, we argue that \staticdeps{}' addition
 to \uica{} is very conclusive: the hints provided by \staticdeps{} are